Hell it's prob full auto and free too.... and a can.Yeah just kinda funny LE wants to run around with braces in the place of a stock but heaven forbid the little guy does the same. Wonder if they have to destroy, turn in or register as in sbr?
Well then the procurement officer is a bonehead for not just putting a stock on it.Hell it's prob full auto and free too.... and a can.
View attachment 246749
Interesting huh?
Wonder if it was purchased by the officer.
The pistol brace? Sorry if I’m not seeing anything else. It’s always different rules for me than thee.
SWAT also probably a foreign country.Uniform says SWAT, but it's awfully tiny letters to be real... any respectable SWAT unit would have better gear, too...
I suspect this guy is off duty and moonlighting as security with his own gear, or straight up larping, or it's an armed private security officer badge and not a LEO badge
View attachment 246840
Uniform says SWAT, but it's awfully tiny letters to be real... any respectable SWAT unit would have better gear, too...
I suspect this guy is off duty and moonlighting as security with his own gear, or straight up larping, or it's an armed private security officer badge and not a LEO badge
View attachment 246840
My point is that if same rules apply, I’d hope that this law enforcement officer has followed the ATF’s guidelines and file for his SBR paperwork or has since removed his brace. If not then yes it would quit hypocritical of him to then turn around and enforce bogus unconstitutional edicts from a non-law making body of the government. Cause we all know, push comes to shove the vast majority will “ just follow their orders”. Cause I mean they have to feed their family right?What's your point?
Lots of people have braces.
Same rules apply to LEO.
The agencies should probably budget better so that the officers don’t have to use their own firearms. Sidearms and rifles that law enforcement use should all be issued items that are all the same, minus the individual suiting it to their needs. Similarly like the Military.I have a strong feeling that AR is personally owned.
My point is that if same rules apply, I’d hope that this law enforcement officer has followed the ATF’s guidelines and file for his SBR paperwork or has since removed his brace. If not then yes it would quit hypocritical of him to then turn around and enforce bogus unconstitutional edicts from a non-law making body of the government. Cause we all know, push comes to shove the vast majority will “ just follow their orders”. Cause I mean they have to feed their family right?
The agencies should probably budget better so that the officers don’t have to use their own firearms. Sidearms and rifles that law enforcement use should all be issued items that are all the same, minus the individual suiting it to their needs. Similarly like the Military.
Since you don’t know either …perhaps you shouldn’t either. No one force you to jump in and comment. You could have very well just went about your day. Just sayin.Since you don't know... perhaps you shouldn't post.
Since you don’t know either …perhaps you shouldn’t either. No one force you to jump in and comment. You could have very well just went about your day. Just sayin.