wildrider666
Master
Even a report from the Chicago Tribune opined that Rittenhouse shooting the three people was Self Defense! This just leaves the Minor in possession of a Firearm Charge, a misdemeanor. They also state the violations referenced WI Code is very ambiguous* and that actually fails in favor of Kyle. He can be acquitted as innocent of the charge by evidence or:
In criminal law, the rule of lenity holds that where a criminal statute is ambiguous, the meaning most favorable to the defendant—i.e., the one that imposes the lowest penalties—should be adopted
* Ambiguity under the Law also splits into two seperate use/applications. The Law in question could very well provide two acquittal paths. Let's not forget its a Misdemeanor Charge that on its own could be handled in several ways if the Prosecution wasn't so biased and bloodthirsty for a conviction.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/colu...0200908-tfhn5g2davdgdemtugaf5t6mce-story.html
The Rifle. The rifle was purchased in WI with Rittenhouse''s money "for" Rittenhouse by his 18YO friend from Illinois who also stored it at his Stepfathers house. This is why the rifle never crossed State lines prior to the shooting. This "Friend" went with Kyle to protect a business in Kenosha. Two S&W M&P15s were turned into police from the trunk of the friends car. I assume the second AR belonged to the friend. There are glaring indications of a Straw Purchase reqarding the firearm used but I haven't read the friends name or straw purchase Charges to either teen. There may well be some prosecutors "Deal" for the friends testimony as the reason it has not been Charged as both would be alleged co-conspirators. IDK?
www.dailyherald.com
In criminal law, the rule of lenity holds that where a criminal statute is ambiguous, the meaning most favorable to the defendant—i.e., the one that imposes the lowest penalties—should be adopted
* Ambiguity under the Law also splits into two seperate use/applications. The Law in question could very well provide two acquittal paths. Let's not forget its a Misdemeanor Charge that on its own could be handled in several ways if the Prosecution wasn't so biased and bloodthirsty for a conviction.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/colu...0200908-tfhn5g2davdgdemtugaf5t6mce-story.html
The Rifle. The rifle was purchased in WI with Rittenhouse''s money "for" Rittenhouse by his 18YO friend from Illinois who also stored it at his Stepfathers house. This is why the rifle never crossed State lines prior to the shooting. This "Friend" went with Kyle to protect a business in Kenosha. Two S&W M&P15s were turned into police from the trunk of the friends car. I assume the second AR belonged to the friend. There are glaring indications of a Straw Purchase reqarding the firearm used but I haven't read the friends name or straw purchase Charges to either teen. There may well be some prosecutors "Deal" for the friends testimony as the reason it has not been Charged as both would be alleged co-conspirators. IDK?
Kyle Rittenhouse extradited to Wisconsin after judge's ruling; records show friend bought rifle for him
Antioch teen Kyle Rittenhouse, who has been charged with fatally shooting two men and wounding a third during civil unrest in Kenosha, was moved to Wisconsin Friday after a Lake County judge's ruling...
www.dailyherald.com
