SAWMAN
Master
Been doing some reading up on the 6.5Creedmore. Trying to figure out why the new enthusiasm over this chambering.
Given the bore is .264" are these bullets supposed to be flatter shooting or something ??
Seems to me that 7mm Creedmore would be better. The .284" bore diameter would be a little better at the longer ranges. How about the old 284Win. Seems that you could just rename that. It would surely shoot flatter than the 6.5C wouldn't it ??
BUT THEN . . . we already have the 7mm-08,260,and 243. Can't they do what the 6.5C is supposed to do ??. And what about the poor 'ol .257" bore guns ?? What about a 257Creedmore ??
I see now that there is some interest in a 6mm Creedmore already. What the heck would that do that a 243Win couldn't do ??
All this Creedmore shit has got me scratching my head. --- SAWMAN
Given the bore is .264" are these bullets supposed to be flatter shooting or something ??
Seems to me that 7mm Creedmore would be better. The .284" bore diameter would be a little better at the longer ranges. How about the old 284Win. Seems that you could just rename that. It would surely shoot flatter than the 6.5C wouldn't it ??
BUT THEN . . . we already have the 7mm-08,260,and 243. Can't they do what the 6.5C is supposed to do ??. And what about the poor 'ol .257" bore guns ?? What about a 257Creedmore ??
I see now that there is some interest in a 6mm Creedmore already. What the heck would that do that a 243Win couldn't do ??
All this Creedmore shit has got me scratching my head. --- SAWMAN