APOD Firearms

stupid things the government says and does...

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Gulf Coast States

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • SUPERLITE69

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Joined
    Nov 18, 2022
    Messages
    202
    Points
    43
    Location
    Picayune, Mississippi
    have you looked the records of these "innocent" convicts she gave life to?
    That’s not relevant to what I said. I’m not talking about *just* these convicts. If there is any reasonable doubt that any lone individual at all, is not completely guilty of the crime for which he is accused, it is unethical to kill him.
     

    SUPERLITE69

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Joined
    Nov 18, 2022
    Messages
    202
    Points
    43
    Location
    Picayune, Mississippi
    jury of their peers, in a ultra liberal state heard evidence, and decided they were guilty..
    right, so you’re just ignoring that I plainly said that my comment wasn’t inherent and exclusive to just this specific group.

    As a whole, as a concept, the death penalty should not be applied to someone for whom there is reasonable doubt that they were falsely convicted, as it is unethical to give the state the ability to sanction the death of an innocent person.

    I can explain it to you, but I can’t understand it for you.
     

    fl57caveman

    eclectic atavist
    GCGF Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Joined
    Jan 23, 2015
    Messages
    12,453
    Points
    113
    Location
    n.w. florida
    right, so you’re just ignoring that I plainly said that my comment wasn’t inherent and exclusive to just this specific group.

    As a whole, as a concept, the death penalty should not be applied to someone for whom there is reasonable doubt that they were falsely convicted, as it is unethical to give the state the ability to sanction the death of an innocent person.

    I can explain it to you, but I can’t understand it for you.
    i got it, ty
     

    fl57caveman

    eclectic atavist
    GCGF Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Joined
    Jan 23, 2015
    Messages
    12,453
    Points
    113
    Location
    n.w. florida
    Hate speech cases across Western Europe are growing more outrageous by the year, with the latest example out of Norway reaching new heights of absurdity. This as various countries' laws get narrower and narrower over what can or cannot be said regarding 'gender identity'.

    A woman in Norway is being threatened by the government with a stiff prison sentence for the alleged "hate speech crime" of pointing out that a man cannot become a lesbian.

     

    Raven

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Joined
    Mar 30, 2020
    Messages
    8,819
    Points
    113
    Hate speech cases across Western Europe are growing more outrageous by the year, with the latest example out of Norway reaching new heights of absurdity. This as various countries' laws get narrower and narrower over what can or cannot be said regarding 'gender identity'.

    A woman in Norway is being threatened by the government with a stiff prison sentence for the alleged "hate speech crime" of pointing out that a man cannot become a lesbian.

    I love it when they eat their own kind :)
     

    Rebel_Rider1969

    Well Known Nuisance
    Rating - 100%
    36   0   0
    Joined
    Sep 12, 2019
    Messages
    20,204
    Points
    113
    Location
    Range, Al. Near Brewton.
    Hate speech cases across Western Europe are growing more outrageous by the year, with the latest example out of Norway reaching new heights of absurdity. This as various countries' laws get narrower and narrower over what can or cannot be said regarding 'gender identity'.

    A woman in Norway is being threatened by the government with a stiff prison sentence for the alleged "hate speech crime" of pointing out that a man cannot become a lesbian.

    I'm a lesbian!
     

    Snake-Eyes

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Joined
    Jun 22, 2013
    Messages
    3,483
    Points
    113
    Location
    Florida
    “By the way, my Corvette’s in a locked garage, so it’s not like they’re sitting out in the street.”

    - Joe Biden to reporters, minutes after the White House confirmed the discovery of even more classified records improperly stored in multiple locations, this time IN HIS GARAGE.
     

    fl57caveman

    eclectic atavist
    GCGF Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Joined
    Jan 23, 2015
    Messages
    12,453
    Points
    113
    Location
    n.w. florida
    History Lesson on Your Social Security Card
    Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (and some older ones) didn't know this.
    It's easy to check out, if you don't believe it. Be sure and show it to your family
    and friends. They need a little history lesson on what's what and it doesn't matter
    whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are Facts.
    Social Security
    Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and
    Card were not to be used for identification purposes. Since nearly everyone in the
    United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the
    message, NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION was removed.
    An old Social Security card with the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION"message.
    Our Social Security
    Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social
    Security (FICA) Program. He promised:
    1) That participation in the Program would be
    completely voluntary,
    No longer Voluntary
    2) That the participants would only have to pay
    1% of the first $1,400 of their annual
    incomes into the Program,
    Now 7.65%
    On the first $90,000.
    3) That the money the participants elected to put
    into the Program would be deductible from
    their income for tax purposes each year,
    No longer tax deductible
    4) That the money the participants put in went to the
    Independent 'Trust Fund' rather than into the
    General Operating Fund, and therefore, would
    only be used to fund the Social Security
    Retirement Program, and no other
    Government program, and,
    Under Johnson the money was moved to
    The General Fund and spent.
    5) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed
    as income.
    Under Clinton & Gore
    up to 85% of your Social Security can be taxed.
    Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are
    now receiving a Social Security check every month --
    and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of
    the money we paid to the Federal government to 'put
    away -- you may be interested in the following:
    ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ----
    Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the
    Independent 'Trust Fund' and put it into the
    General Fund so that Congress could spend it?
    A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the Democratically
    controlled House and Senate.
    ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --
    Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax
    deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
    A: The Democratic Party.
    ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----
    Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social
    Security annuities?
    A: The Democratic Party with Al Gore casting the
    'tie-breaking' deciding vote as President of the
    Senate, while he was Vice President of the U.S.
     

    fl57caveman

    eclectic atavist
    GCGF Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Joined
    Jan 23, 2015
    Messages
    12,453
    Points
    113
    Location
    n.w. florida
    more;

    Q: Which Political Party decided to start
    giving annuity payments to immigrants?
    (AND MY FAVORITE):
    A: That's right!
    Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party.
    Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65,
    began to receive Social Security payments! The
    Democratic Party gave these payments to them,
    even though they never paid a dime into it!
    ------------ -- ------------ --------- ----- ------------ --------- ---------
    Then, after violating the original contract (FICA),
    the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans
    want to take your Social Security away!
     
    Top Bottom