HD Tactical

stupid things the government says and does...

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Gulf Coast States

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • standles

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Joined
    Jan 18, 2019
    Messages
    30
    Points
    18
    Location
    niceville
    It also means millions would now have a TIN that were not eligible otherwise.

    By contrast, the Democrats’ plan proposes sending payments to people with Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) filers and their families. The change would mean that more than 4.3 million adults and 3.5 million children would be eligible for the payment, according to ITEP.
     

    Ricochet

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Joined
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages
    1,271
    Points
    113
    Location
    Florida
    Just to double up..

     

    Snake-Eyes

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Joined
    Jun 22, 2013
    Messages
    3,463
    Points
    113
    Location
    Florida
    87-years-OLD, and that traitorous hypocrite is walking around without a mask.

    Too bad this virus is a scam. I wouldn't shed a tear if she caught it for real and proved how risky her behavior supposedly is.
     

    fl57caveman

    eclectic atavist
    GCGF Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Joined
    Jan 23, 2015
    Messages
    12,390
    Points
    113
    Location
    n.w. florida
    now that she has bankrupted thousands of small business by forcing closures, she is crying for money …


    kind of like pinching a baby to make it cry, then picking it up to comfort it..



    LANSING, Mich. – Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer reached out to the Republican-led legislature to pass a $100 million package.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: FLT

    Ricochet

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Joined
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages
    1,271
    Points
    113
    Location
    Florida
    now that she has bankrupted thousands of small business by forcing closures, she is crying for money …


    kind of like pinching a baby to make it cry, then picking it up to comfort it..



    LANSING, Mich. – Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer reached out to the Republican-led legislature to pass a $100 million package.
    These people are sick and/or demon possessed.
    In her case and Hillary Clinton I go with demonic possession.
     

    wildrider666

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Joined
    Sep 26, 2012
    Messages
    8,753
    Points
    113
    Location
    Panama City Beach, Fl
    There's probably some needs for funds but Whitmer is trying to buy back her lost popularity and support. Her ratings were in the toilet. Whats the dem/Left fix for that: FREE shit so people will stop criticizing her and vote for her! Based on 2019 population, that's almost $10K for every man, woman and child in the State.
     

    wildrider666

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Joined
    Sep 26, 2012
    Messages
    8,753
    Points
    113
    Location
    Panama City Beach, Fl
    The Left Majority House just passed a Fed Bill to decriminalize marijuana! Timing is brilliant on their part. If Senate Rep. Majority shoots it down or tables it without action: The Left will use that response to generate more Votes in Ga to win Senate Seats for the Left and take control of the Senate! Vote Dem and Pot will be decriminalized in Fed Law! Pro pot heads are more politically active than those opposed as most pot related bills Pass in State voting. Watch and see!
     

    wildrider666

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Joined
    Sep 26, 2012
    Messages
    8,753
    Points
    113
    Location
    Panama City Beach, Fl
    Nice speech, all well and good Sherriff; now how about treating the 2A the same way, issuing a CWP? That "May issue and for good cause" bullshit makes it a mother may I permissionn that slip that only serves to restricts a Right.
     

    Ross7

    Virtuoso
    GCGF Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Joined
    Jun 30, 2014
    Messages
    2,642
    Points
    113
    Location
    NW Florida
    "Why no officer, of course not. That's just a homemade fishing hook."

    1g4VOXU.jpg
     

    fl57caveman

    eclectic atavist
    GCGF Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Joined
    Jan 23, 2015
    Messages
    12,390
    Points
    113
    Location
    n.w. florida
    COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — The arrest of a man handling a weapon while he was drunk in his own home was constitutional, a divided Ohio Supreme Court ruled Wednesday.

    An attorney for defendant Fred Weber had argued his 2018 arrest was unconstitutional because he was at home and the weapon was unloaded at the time.

    Weber never should have been charged or convicted under current law, since there was no evidence the shotgun was being carried with an intent to use it, his attorney argued.


    Prosecutors disagreed and said the law was constitutional as applied to his situation.

    By handling his weapon while he was drunk, Weber scared his wife enough that she felt compelled to call police, prosecutors argued.

    The Supreme Court ruled 4-3 that the state law banning the possession of a weapon while intoxicated regulates “inherently dangerous” conduct and does not impinge on broader Second Amendment rights.

    The law “is a targeted restriction that prohibits a narrow range of conduct (carrying or using a gun) for a very limited period of time (while someone is in a state of intoxication) due to the inherently dangerous nature of carrying or using a gun while in that state,” Chief Justice Maureen O'Connor said, writing for the majority.

    Gary Rosenhoffer, Weber's attorney, said they're weighing their options, including asking the high court to reconsider or asking the U.S. Supreme Court to take the case.
     

    maxfold

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Joined
    Sep 30, 2012
    Messages
    2,239
    Points
    113
    Location
    Milton - gulf of mexico
    COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — The arrest of a man handling a weapon while he was drunk in his own home was constitutional, a divided Ohio Supreme Court ruled Wednesday.

    An attorney for defendant Fred Weber had argued his 2018 arrest was unconstitutional because he was at home and the weapon was unloaded at the time.

    Weber never should have been charged or convicted under current law, since there was no evidence the shotgun was being carried with an intent to use it, his attorney argued.


    Prosecutors disagreed and said the law was constitutional as applied to his situation.

    By handling his weapon while he was drunk, Weber scared his wife enough that she felt compelled to call police, prosecutors argued.

    The Supreme Court ruled 4-3 that the state law banning the possession of a weapon while intoxicated regulates “inherently dangerous” conduct and does not impinge on broader Second Amendment rights.

    The law “is a targeted restriction that prohibits a narrow range of conduct (carrying or using a gun) for a very limited period of time (while someone is in a state of intoxication) due to the inherently dangerous nature of carrying or using a gun while in that state,” Chief Justice Maureen O'Connor said, writing for the majority.

    Gary Rosenhoffer, Weber's attorney, said they're weighing their options, including asking the high court to reconsider or asking the U.S. Supreme Court to take the case.
    Was his wife Drinking also ?
     

    wildrider666

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Joined
    Sep 26, 2012
    Messages
    8,753
    Points
    113
    Location
    Panama City Beach, Fl
    H
    COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — The arrest of a man handling a weapon while he was drunk in his own home was constitutional, a divided Ohio Supreme Court ruled Wednesday.
    An attorney for defendant Fred Weber had argued his 2018 arrest was unconstitutional because he was at home and the weapon was unloaded at the time.
    Weber never should have been charged or convicted under current law, since there was no evidence the shotgun was being carried with an intent to use it, his attorney argued. Prosecutors disagreed and said the law was constitutional as applied to his situation.

    By handling his weapon while he was drunk, Weber scared his wife enough that she felt compelled to call police, prosecutors argued.

    The Supreme Court ruled 4-3 that the state law banning the possession of a weapon while intoxicated regulates “inherently dangerous” conduct and does not impinge on broader Second Amendment rights.

    The law “is a targeted restriction that prohibits a narrow range of conduct (carrying or using a gun) for a very limited period of time (while someone is in a state of intoxication) due to the inherently dangerous nature of carrying or using a gun while in that state,” Chief Justice Maureen O'Connor said, writing for the majority.

    Gary Rosenhoffer, Weber's attorney, said they're weighing their options, including asking the high court to reconsider or asking the U.S. Supreme Court to take the case.
    "In the comfort of his THEIR (His and Wife's) Home. There is no Right to total privacy between a husband and wife living in the same home. if he wanted more privacy, he should have handled the gun without the Wife's knowledge. The scared Wife called 911 for assistance, information is now Public and provided to Responders. The Husband was reported as "highly intoxicated" by LE and Wife said he was drunk (but no BAC Level is provided), did he check the chamber(s)? Did he remove shells? We don't know but it appears his judgment could have been impaired either way. Why would the Wife be scared of or about an "unloaded" shotgun? I can only conclude that it wasn't presented as "unloaded" to the Wife or it was presented as a club. We don't have the whole story. A drunk with a gun doesn't get the benefit of doubt in this case.
     
    Top Bottom