wildrider666
Master
In the Governments own words referencing NFA of 1934, changes incorperated by Title II of the Gun Control Act of 1968:
"Title II also amended the NFA definitions of “firearm” by adding “destructive devices” and expanding the definition of “machinegun.”"
Pay attention: that's expanding the definition of "machinegun" BY specific CONGRESSIONAL intent and ACTION! DOJ does not have equal authority to Congress. Delegated Authority does not allow changes to specific intent provided by Congress (thats Case Law). If it required Congerssional approval last time "the defination of machinegun" was expanded: it requires Congressional approval to change it again. Clearly an un Constitutional abuse of power by the DOJ. Nothing else is needed to kill/overturn the Rule Change. Maybe some Lawyer will figure it out too.
https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/national-firearms-act
"Title II also amended the NFA definitions of “firearm” by adding “destructive devices” and expanding the definition of “machinegun.”"
Pay attention: that's expanding the definition of "machinegun" BY specific CONGRESSIONAL intent and ACTION! DOJ does not have equal authority to Congress. Delegated Authority does not allow changes to specific intent provided by Congress (thats Case Law). If it required Congerssional approval last time "the defination of machinegun" was expanded: it requires Congressional approval to change it again. Clearly an un Constitutional abuse of power by the DOJ. Nothing else is needed to kill/overturn the Rule Change. Maybe some Lawyer will figure it out too.
https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/national-firearms-act