Bay Ranger
Master
I read a news report early on that he bought the rifle on the internet. Anybody hear this? Did he have it delivered to the Nevada dealer? If he was a Cali resident how did he purchase the rifle in Nevada legally?
-
Please read the new forum rules! REQUIRED!
Click Here: https://www.gulfcoastgunforum.com/threads/general-forum-rules-code-of-conduct.70770/
-
New Reloading Sticky Thread for Trading, Swapping Gear, etc.
https://www.gulfcoastgunforum.com/threads/reloading-components-for-trade-item-value-and-photo.104847/
Another shooting in a gun-free zone
- Thread starter Snake-Eyes
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Gulf Coast States
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Snake-Eyes
Master
Saw the same info. Dealer is in Nevada. It may have been their own website for online ordering, or it could've been someone else's. Regardless, he picked it up and did the background check in Nevada.
I don't know the exact law, but you can buy a long gun in a state that borders your state of residence. Pistols, no. Rifles and shotguns, yes. So, the purchase was perfectly legal.
The "import" (if that's even the appropriate word for interstate movement in the US) of that "evil gun" into Kommifornia was "illegal" under Kommiefornian "law".
Edit to add: this is all a moot point, whether he bought it legally in another state and illegally brought it into Kommiefornia, or he bought a rifle legally in Kommifornia, or he bought it illegally from pick-your-source. The bottom line is he committed murder. The tool, or where he got it, is not particularly fundamental to the criminal or the crime. If guns didn't exist, he would've used something else. Why? Because guns-not-existing won't change the fact that he was a coward and a murderer.
Last edited:
wildrider666
Master
The legality of how he got the AK and where, go to two sets of data used by gun grabbers. Yes it was illegal to bring the AK into CA. Gun grabbers will blame neighboring States as "pipline sources" for the illegal weapons. In turn they push for neighboring States and Fed to adopt CAs stricter Laws restrictions and bans.
Snake-Eyes
Master
Sure. Because that's how they think: it must be the gun's fault. If the degenerate didn't have access to a gun, he wouldn't commit a crime. There's no way he would resort to other methods of killing people like bows, bombs, knives, vehicles, fire, poison, rocks, sharks w/lasers, etc...
So, either the gun-control people really are that oblivious, or they know exactly what those laws would mean for the future of the Nation. Either way, they are on the wrong side of the issue.
