RaySendero
Shooter
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2020
- Messages
- 57
- Points
- 18
So isn't there a time limit to purchase records?
-
Please read the new forum rules! REQUIRED!
Click Here: https://www.gulfcoastgunforum.com/threads/general-forum-rules-code-of-conduct.70770/
-
New Reloading Sticky Thread for Trading, Swapping Gear, etc.
https://www.gulfcoastgunforum.com/threads/reloading-components-for-trade-item-value-and-photo.104847/
7 Dec Start Date for rule
- Thread starter tros6t
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Gulf Coast States
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Rebel_Rider1969
Well Known Nuisance
Don't care what those nuts dream up. Damage is done. They know the common guy will get wind of a "rule" and stop doing what ever big daddy says. They know what they are doing. Psyops.
Just read where the NRA is griping about the "for profit" wording. NRA's stance seemed to be that ATF would view making a profit as being in business. We'll see. Either way it'll be what best furthers the agenda.
Times sure are tough. Sorry, but that dictates that I have to add significant handling and security fees over and above the item price. Fees, not taxes, for safety.
Times sure are tough. Sorry, but that dictates that I have to add significant handling and security fees over and above the item price. Fees, not taxes, for safety.
wvfatboy
Master
What is the new rule brother ?
FNHman
Marksman
Exactly.
And the government doesn't have the authority to tell you how many guns, cars, boats, kitchen pans, etc that your allowed to buy so they sure as F don't have the authority to tell you how many of any of those items your allowed to sell.
Arming crimals with guns is already illegal. Reporting capital gains is already required by law. There was and will never be a need for this unconstitutional ruling.
Allow citizens to do a free NICS check. Remind citizens to report capital gains. That's all the government should do
Snake-Eyes
Master
Agreed except for the “capital gains” parts. That BS shouldn’t exist.
So, I voluntarily trade my time, energy, and expertise to do a job in exchange for money.
I get TAXED on that money. Then if I buy something (with that already taxed money), I get TAXED again. If I decide to sell that item later, I’m going to get TAXED again if I’m smart enough to make a profit.
The slave-holder mafia known as the eye-our-ass can eff right off.
FNHman
Marksman
Too bad that capital gains doesn't take into account inflation because my 1994 milled mak91 that I bought with 70 hours worth of minimum wage hours would sell for a grand today but technically there is no profit due to the value of money going down one would have to still work for 70plus hrs of minimum wage to purchase it from me.
They are scamming us every chance they can get. There is no money.....
What law? Pick one. Have you researched/verified Constitutionality of the "laws" you obey, or do you just go by/with whatever "authority" says?
To answer, I'm not referencing any particular law. What I am simply saying is, any "law" is null/void if not Constitutional. Don't care who/how many "voted" in favor/for it. I encourage those that dare/will question to go find their own answer(s). Don't take my word for it. In fact, conclusively prove me wrong.
This Nation was founded as a Constitutional Republic, and still is on paper. In practice? That's another matter...
Last edited:
It is not a law it is a change to definitions primarily to what in the business of and who is required to have a FFL it is proposed this is a reply from to the proposed rule
if it is adopted they should publish that it has been adopted but they are the government they can do anything they want
www.gunsamerica.com
if it is adopted they should publish that it has been adopted but they are the government they can do anything they want
NSSF Submits Comment on Biden's New 'Engaged in the Business' Rule
Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF’s Senior Vice President and General Counsel, stated, “Respectfully, ATF lacks legal authority to do so.”
www.gunsamerica.com
Right. Rules to be referenced as they entertain/justify enforcement, and again while/after enforcing "laws." Current example, any mistake an FFL makes on paperwork is deemed under rules as a willful mistake and the "law" enforced accordingly. Rules enable agencies/agents to arrest/confiscate, and then turn the legality part over to the courts. What could go wrong.It is not a law it is a change to definitions primarily to what in the business of and who is required to have a FFL it is proposed this is a reply from to the proposed rule
if it is adopted they should publish that it has been adopted but they are the government they can do anything they want
NSSF Submits Comment on Biden's New 'Engaged in the Business' Rule
Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF’s Senior Vice President and General Counsel, stated, “Respectfully, ATF lacks legal authority to do so.”
Last edited:
