I build an Ar and then I sell them using the gunshow loophole. I never keep one. I only keep my over/under shotguns. They're all I really need.
Do all your buying now before even private sales are made to go through an FFL..I would not doubt this is going to happen. You know it is funny, I have built 5 AR's in 223/556 and the one now is the only one I even got to shoot before someone bought it...I just have no use for them since I run the 6.8 and X39 AR's
IIRC correctly the background check does not record the precise model of rifle. The 4473 form does record what you bought. There is also some sort of log that the dealer keeps that is for many dealer digital, but I am not sure what it is.If I buy new, does the background check also serve as notice to the government that I am an AR15 owner? Assume buying used is safer?
My take: Make sure your DNA is gone from anything that you sell, especially if you sell to strangers. Many do not know that if any blood relative of yours has had their DNA sequenced, they might then be able to get a partial hit on yours. For murder cases they can put to use sufficient resources to narrow it down to various relatives and could eventually be on your door step. Just selling a self manufactured AR sans serial number, etc could have legal consequences for those lacking the correct manufacturing license. I am not sure about this and do not want to be a test case for it. You may make guns w/o a license for your own use, but are not supposed to sell it.I build an Ar and then I sell them using the gunshow loophole. I never keep one. I only keep my over/under shotguns. They're all I really need.
Bleach and sunlight is usually hard on nucleic acids. Before you go there you better remove tool marks or at least get rid the tools your used to make the lower AR receiver.Has anyone bought the DNA remover that scans and destroys all DNA from property you sell. Seems to be pretty efficient
Well then...
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
A new method of DNA testing could solve more shootings
Criminologists thought it was impossible to get DNA off of shell casings, but a technique pioneered in the Netherlands is having notable results https://www.policeone.com/police-pr...od-of-DNA-testing-could-solve-more-shootings/
More than three decades after the spate of killings and home invasions ended, investigators last year tracked down and arrested former police officer Joseph DeAngelo, 73, after comparing DNA found at crime scenes to data on commercial genealogy websites. So far they have charged him with 13 counts of murder and kidnapping from 1975 through 1986. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...spect-of-1975-murder-prosecutor-idUSKCN1P31P9
Why in the F@#% would one sell an unregistered a receiver in the first place?
Fixed it for you.
Thanks!
When I say registered what I really meant was serialized when manufactured. I don't support a national registry.
This whole idea of a door to door confiscation and if you have serialized firearms they will be coming for you just doesn't pass the reality test. It's a logistical impossibility. The shear size and cost of it would be outrageous. Not to mention I imagine they would quickly run out of people willing to put themselves at risk to enforce it.
Picturing in my mind the first conflicted poor bastard in a stack at the door with a look of fear about to raid the red flagged grizzled old Vietnam vet. Dude has made peace with the life he's lived, has Fortunate Son blaring on the stereo, and is locked and loaded screaming come and take it....lol
Canada passed a law to only register every long gun and it swelled from an estimated cost of 2 million to 1 billion and the effort was abandoned.
So a national registry ain't happening because it's too expensive and no-one would comply and sure as hell door to door confiscation is all but impossible.
So again. Why the F@$% risk federal prison to sell a self-manufactured unserialized gun in a private sale for peanuts when an unregistered but serialized receiver can be had for $50 bucks? I've always thought these crap polymer 80% receivers had the potential to get people into deep sh!t.
All I'm saying is to think clearly and don't do something so minor in reality yet with potentially huge consequences and personal cost just to "stick it to the man" about gun laws in one's own head.
I build an Ar and then I sell them using the gunshow loophole. I never keep one. I only keep my over/under shotguns. They're all I really need.
And this is the kind of behavior that gives the gun control groups evidence for universal back ground checks.
Yes. A joke gives them evidence.
For all the sensitive Susans out there, I have a drawer full of AR lowers. I do not believe in the "Gunshow Loophole". I do think an Over/Under is all I need for bird hunting and if Robert Francis hadn't come out with his "Hell Yes" statement, Trump would be trying to "compromise" and erode even more gun rights away.