Newsom proposes 28th Amend to US Constitution

[sebastiandangerfield]

 

[rossi]

Doe's that mean "No Armed Security Detail" for him and his?

 

[sebastiandangerfield]

 

[DixieReb]

Newsome is a show boat and a lying piece of $h:t that says any stupid thing he can think of to attract attention to himself and said thing is , is that there are plenty of buffoons in California that will suck it all in and follow him off a cliff, heaven help us if he gets the Dem nomination and he pulls off a win to be the next President

 

[OperationalPinecone]

What's an assault rifle?

 

[rossi]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought we have a pretty substantial background check in effect now........???

Who's "Checking Backgrounds" of the new " Let In's" at the Southern, and Northern Borders......?????

 

[rossi]

I have a "PROPOSAL FOR NEWSOM", but I can't post it here.

 

[Beached]

I whole heartily second that proposal! Worse thing ever happened to that state he is related to Polosi so can’t expect much corruption and robbing taxpayers.

 

[sebastiandangerfield]

I understand these bozos in both parties are going to do their respective political theater but I get real anxious and grumpy when it involves 2A or Medicare & Social Security stuff- one never knows when a ground swell of support will take off.

 

[Bay Ranger]

I got a personal text from him on my phone telling me about this and giving me a link to go to a web site so I can include my name to a petition for this. I feel so empowered!!!!!!!!

Just to protect myself, that is the highest form of sarcasm.

 

[IronBeard]

Up front, FTG.

No, just HELL NO, on anymore amendments, that contradict/nullify any prior amendment(s). We've got enough of that already, and need to clean it up, IMO. Then, let's start factually tracing every "law" in existence back to the Constitution. Can't do that? Gone. Next?

 

[PensacolaOperator]

Lol. Lmao, even.

S H A L L
H
A
L
L

N O T
O
T

B E
E

I N F R I N G E D
N
F
R
I
N
G
E
D

 

[PensacolaOperator]

Up front, FTG.

No, just HELL NO, on anymore amendments, that contradict/nullify any prior amendment(s). We've got enough of that already, and need to clean it up, IMO. Then, let's start factually tracing every "law" in existence back to the Constitution. Can't do that? Gone. Next?

I'd even posit that any amendments to the constitution should be deemed inferior to the original Bill of Rights, and easily nullified by the Bill of Rights.

 

[IronBeard]

I'd even posit that any amendments to the constitution should be deemed inferior to the original Bill of Rights, and easily nullified by the Bill of Rights.

Yep, I could get onboard with an effort to validate/verify.

 

[donr101395]

That idiot isn’t banning anything for me and I pity the fool(s) sent to collect them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk