I know of knowledgeable people that use the 6.5 Grendel in 12.5 inch barrels. I went 18 inches with mine.Any bullet is going benefit from a longer barrel, until the friction starts reducing velocity. Less velocity is going to reduce effective range. A 12.5" grendel isn't going to shoot as far as a 24". Guys talk about the 300 being "optimized" for shorter barrels but will still get a velocity boost in a 16"
Is there any benefit to the grendel in 12.5 relative to a similarly sized setup in 6.8, 300 or 5.56? Depends on what you're looking for.
This is a old chart, View attachment 82272
They go slower but they retain more at distance. The 224val is slower than the 22nos but it retains the velocity better than the shorter/ lighter bullet(depending on load used).My numbers came from a thread on Snipershide. It was an 18” Grendal. The 5.56 load is mine from a 20” white oak. Longer heavier bullets only go slower. What would be an expected velocity for a 130 hybrid? Could these be loaded to AR Mag length? I would expect single feed only