-
Please read the new forum rules! REQUIRED!
Click Here: https://www.gulfcoastgunforum.com/threads/general-forum-rules-code-of-conduct.70770/
-
New Reloading Sticky Thread for Trading, Swapping Gear, etc.
https://www.gulfcoastgunforum.com/threads/reloading-components-for-trade-item-value-and-photo.104847/
Florida is Screwed if this Guy becomes the next Governor
- Thread starter Stagman
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Gulf Coast States
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Likely needs its own thread. We are not Yugoslavia 1988 fortunately. But I do agree within reason of doing some of what is called being a prepper.
Some differences between us and Yugoslavia are 10% of their population did die in WWII, often at the hands of their neighbors. Fighting between those peoples over the centuries with Serbians knights, turkish janissaries, with Albanians and other thrown in has been long lasting. Closest we had was the Civil War. Remember it was Serbs that killed the Arch Duke and his wife starting WWII. Yugoslavia was only held together by the iron hand of Tito. No Tito and civil war was the result.
LowRiderRed
Master
If you're talking about Archduke Ferdinand being assassinated, I believe that is what started WW I, not WW II.
Yes it was a typo and WWI, I cannot type well.
But I think you got the point that Yugoslavia is not the USA
Last edited:
JBryan314
Master
We are similar in the sense that both countries are without a strong cultural connection, multiethnic, multiracial, and certain ethnicities and races are favored by those in charge. We similar in the sense that we are all forced to accept every aspect of every culture, even the negatives, especially the negatives, and embrace them as positives. We are similar in the sense that all these starkly different cultures have been forced into proximity with little to no outlet or way for us to voluntarily separate. None of this cultural mixing is voluntary.
And so we have friction between the races and cultures, building pressure with no outlet.
I understand that we are not literally Yugoslavia circa 1988, because there are differences in our distant histories. I'm not talking about literal differences. I'm talking about the track we are taking with forced multiculturalism and having certain people's favored over others by the state.
It was held together by Tito for a while. How'd that work out? There is no Yugoslavia now.
https://freeamericannational.blogspot.com/2017/02/similarities-between-yugoslavia-and-us.html?m=1
well spoken
JBryan314
Master
Thanks. It really doesn't have anything to do with the Archduke, either World War, our Civil War, or any of that. It has everything to do with the state forced proximity of fundamentally different cultures, and the state-dictated advantages for certain cultures over others, certain cultures being forced to embrace the negative aspects of other cultures, and the inability of these fundamentally different cultures to peacefully separate from each other voluntarily, temporarily or permanently.
This forced multiculturalism with advantages given to certain peoples over others is Yugoslavia 1988, and America 2008, continuing today.
To show the diversity in the area of the former yugoslavia there is more than one kind of muslim. For example there are albanians, some muslims are people originally of slavic origns that converted, and I think there are also some of genuine Turk ethnicity. The Serbs are Orthodox Christians and the Croats are catholic.
In this country the Muslims are a very small minority and have only been important relative to some terrorism type killings. They are also important at local gas stations and some other businesses that they own.
I am not too worried about less than 4 million muslims here in the immediate future. I would worry more about the cartels that started showing up in emerald coast area after the hurricanes back about 2004-5.
JBryan314
Master
Funny, that.
Though for us, I wouldn't say that they're in the middle. They're part of it. The middle is firmly occupied by Hispanics from South of the border.
JBryan314
Master
The problem is not which cultures are specifically involved. The problem is that the fundamentally different cultures are being forced together with outlet for the pressure.
When the Muslims become something worth worrying about, you'll wish that you'd worried earlier.
Have you ever asked yourself why your federal and state governments would be so heavily invested in bringing people, specifically people who don't look or act like you, over here in large numbers? Or why they're so heavily invested in painting a positive picture of the fact that less and less people in your country look like you, act like you, speak your language, share your cultural norms? And why they specifically paint a negative picture of your culture in general?
Why would your government want to do that? What's the end goal?
Do you believe that their end goal includes your happiness, your culture, your family, or even you being alive at all?
These are things to think about, to worry about, right now
Last edited:
JBryan314
Master
The problem is not the people. The problem I'm talking about is not Hispanics themselves, or blacks or Muslims themselves. The problem is the "why?".
My daughter's worksheets and textbooks from school are covered with pictures of Hispanic people. Covered. And I have no issue with the pictures or the people. What do I have a problem with? The problem I have, is that I know WHY it's being done.
I know WHY my daughter's textbooks are covered with Hispanic people, despite our country being nearly 70% non-Hispanic white. I know WHY television commercials are filled with interracial couples. I know WHY there is always a woman wearing hijab included in every photo of a group of people my sister's sociology textbook.
The problem isn't the people. The problem is the "why?".
My daughter's worksheets and textbooks from school are covered with pictures of Hispanic people. Covered. And I have no issue with the pictures or the people. What do I have a problem with? The problem I have, is that I know WHY it's being done.
I know WHY my daughter's textbooks are covered with Hispanic people, despite our country being nearly 70% non-Hispanic white. I know WHY television commercials are filled with interracial couples. I know WHY there is always a woman wearing hijab included in every photo of a group of people my sister's sociology textbook.
The problem isn't the people. The problem is the "why?".
LowRiderRed
Master
So please tell us.....why?
it was not the best choice of words..esp with the manic liberal media ready to jump on anything
he has George soros money behind him..i hope he loses. the dem I mean
I do not have the information to give adequate intelligence summaries. I and a lot of other people are of the opinion that drug cartels that are primarily hispanic in membership are active now days in the emerald coast. They came with the large influx of hispanic workers that were brought in for hurricane clean up and repair and many never left. The immigration agents deported a lot of them later that were working without the right documents from places such as the ellyson industrial park here in Pensacola, FL. The local supermarkets have noticeable spanish speakers in them that used to be not the case here. Nothing personally on my part against hispanic people since they are very good workers if they here legally. But, some of these people are connected to cartel type criminal organizations that we can do without.
