Sorry to hear that. I have personal experience with him or anyone else on the Hill.
-
Please read the new forum rules! REQUIRED!
Click Here: https://www.gulfcoastgunforum.com/threads/general-forum-rules-code-of-conduct.70770/
-
New Reloading Sticky Thread for Trading, Swapping Gear, etc.
https://www.gulfcoastgunforum.com/threads/reloading-components-for-trade-item-value-and-photo.104847/
Procedural vote fails
- Thread starter flappininthebreeze
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Gulf Coast States
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Sorry to hear that. I have personal experience with him or anyone else on the Hill.
LowRiderRed
Master
Got some links to show where all of that has been debunked, or do we just have to take your word for it? Serious question here.
An uncle of mine who lives in south Florida is a lifelong Republican. He decided to run for city council but in his area of Florida a Republican would not get elected to the city council so he changed his registration to democrat and got elected. When his term was up he did not want to run again so left office and changed his registration back to Republican.
For the 2 years or whatever it was that he was a city councilman he was no more a democrat than you are a Republican. Party affiliation has nothing to do with how you are registered it's in the thought process, or in the case of democrats, lack of thought process.
:focus:
OP:Procedural vote fails
OP:Procedural vote fails
These stupid b......s have done it. Govt shutdown pending. Who of us has to go back to work with no guarantee of getting paid? Welfare recipients don’t. Their checks will not be affected. Neither will Congress’. How’s that for fair.
and so far, we have veared into trump's golf days, (anyone remember 17 day obamba Hawaii vacations), and other assorted deflections (typical liberal tactic, bring other things in the dicussions to take away focus on OP), who is a democrat or republican(seems to me, if it quacks like a duck, it usually is a duck), and talk about military readiness....
anyone read alinsky lately?
I think I will go massage my man parts again...btw, that was some funny moderating, and spoton
and so far, we have veared into trump's golf days, (anyone remember 17 day obamba Hawaii vacations), and other assorted deflections (typical liberal tactic, bring other things in the dicussions to take away focus on OP), who is a democrat or republican(seems to me, if it quacks like a duck, it usually is a duck), and talk about military readiness....
anyone read alinsky lately?
I think I will go massage my man parts again...btw, that was some funny moderating, and spoton
bohica793
Master
It only benefits politicians.
I am definitely more liberal than the more vocal members of this board. That does not change the fact that I am a Republican registered as such since 1984. From my point of view the current version of the party is so far to the right of Reagan that he would have been called a RINO.
I think it is a big deal so . . . . back at you 
Ronald Reagan is idolized by the current Republicans. But they don't seem to remember that in 1986 Reagan gave legal status to all illegal immigrants who were here before 1982. Here is a quote from the article
"Still, the administration's major themes remain unaltered: in a plan that already is producing odd political alignments, the White House would confer eventual legal status on millions of aliens now considered illegals, create a "guest worker" program for Mexicans that some critics are calling "institutionalized serfdom"—and for the first time, penalize employers who break the rules."
http://www.newsweek.com/reagan-immigration-reform-and-control-act-1986-641806
This law gave legal status to some 3 million illegal immigrants.
Here is a quote from Reagan:
"I believe in the idea of amnesty for those who have put down roots and lived here, even though sometime back they may have entered illegally," Ronald Reagan said in 1984.
https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128303672
How do you think Reagan would vote in connection with DACA? I believe he would vote to give them amnesty.
Ronald Reagan is idolized by the current Republicans. But they don't seem to remember that in 1986 Reagan gave legal status to all illegal immigrants who were here before 1982. Here is a quote from the article
"Still, the administration's major themes remain unaltered: in a plan that already is producing odd political alignments, the White House would confer eventual legal status on millions of aliens now considered illegals, create a "guest worker" program for Mexicans that some critics are calling "institutionalized serfdom"—and for the first time, penalize employers who break the rules."
http://www.newsweek.com/reagan-immigration-reform-and-control-act-1986-641806
This law gave legal status to some 3 million illegal immigrants.
Here is a quote from Reagan:
"I believe in the idea of amnesty for those who have put down roots and lived here, even though sometime back they may have entered illegally," Ronald Reagan said in 1984.
https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128303672
How do you think Reagan would vote in connection with DACA? I believe he would vote to give them amnesty.
Reagan signed the largest tax cut in the history of the country in his first year. However a year later when the expected economic boom did not occur, he then reversed course and signed the largest tax increase in the history of the country. Here are some links:
"1982: The most significant tax increase Reagan signed was also the first. The Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (yes, another law with a very sexy name) increased taxes by almost 1 percent of GDP.
The 1982 tax increase was "probably the largest peacetime tax increase in American history," said economist Bruce Bartlett, who advised Reagan on domestic policy and then worked as Treasury deputy assistant secretary for economic policy in the George H.W. Bush administration. (An analysis by Jerry Tempalski, an analyst in the Office of Tax Analysis with the U.S. Department of the Treasury, agrees.)
This law was driven by pressure to attack the federal budget deficit, as well as the impression that Reagan’s tax-cutting was partially responsible for lower-than-expected tax revenues."
http://www.politifact.com/punditfac...n-colbert-brings-ronald-reagans-tax-raising-/
"President Reagan raised taxes eleven times over the course of his presidency, all in the name of fiscal responsibility, but the overall tax burden went down during his presidency."
Reaganomics - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reaganomics
"1982: The most significant tax increase Reagan signed was also the first. The Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (yes, another law with a very sexy name) increased taxes by almost 1 percent of GDP.
The 1982 tax increase was "probably the largest peacetime tax increase in American history," said economist Bruce Bartlett, who advised Reagan on domestic policy and then worked as Treasury deputy assistant secretary for economic policy in the George H.W. Bush administration. (An analysis by Jerry Tempalski, an analyst in the Office of Tax Analysis with the U.S. Department of the Treasury, agrees.)
This law was driven by pressure to attack the federal budget deficit, as well as the impression that Reagan’s tax-cutting was partially responsible for lower-than-expected tax revenues."
http://www.politifact.com/punditfac...n-colbert-brings-ronald-reagans-tax-raising-/
"President Reagan raised taxes eleven times over the course of his presidency, all in the name of fiscal responsibility, but the overall tax burden went down during his presidency."
Reaganomics - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reaganomics
The legislation was better known as the Simpson-Mazzoli Act, named for its sponsors, Simpson and then-Rep. Romano Mazzoli, D-Ky.The problem with the 1986 law was that the promised enforcement didn’t occur, but the amnesty did, Meese said.
I think he would realize what a mistake he made in 84 and vote against DACA and/or amnesty.
Maybe, maybe not. However, one thing is certain, whatever his position on this issue, he would inform the congressional leadership and would not waffle or play games.
Hahahahha, I'm not a Trump fan other than I love the fact that he drives liberals insane.............eeerrrrr more insane.
Insaner?
Viking1204
Master
Deal pending, it appears the Dems agreed based on promises from the Republicans to work on Immigration and a few other things.
Staff online
-
Richard LipsMake America Florida
Members online
- Kbud
- Derek
- pcolagator
- Zachhare22
- Kingwoodsman
- Bulldog1971
- LowRiderRed
- Drew32
- jjbollin
- Richard Lips
- Mike2250
- Hunterbiden
- REDHORSE556
- HebrewHammer
- maccleod90
- nb&twil
- dhammsmx
- rsw669961
- Rockola2004
- wvfatboy
- Bfug
- FlyingMonkey
- Awhite896
- Q4Q
- HazmatFatCat
- lcapitan22
- Rsax28
- 850gunguy
- pfunk
- RVGuru
- Havock90
- Stanley21
- Southalabama
- timc
- Mrgalvan
- WhateverWoodsman
- DangDang
- BravoPapa
- Garybrewer22
- ivythizzle06
- Djbama89
- Nslade
- JB1960
- U-GOT-LIT
- hunter01
